arc4plus1@1.1.4
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "软件架构4+1视图自动生成器。当用户表达"生成架构视图"、"4+1视图"、"软件架构分析"、"4+1架构视图"、"软件架构文档"、"架构4+1"或类似表达时触发此技能。给定代码文件或工程目录，自动分析并生成 5 个视图（逻辑/过程/物理/开发/场景）+ README 文档，全部使用 Mermaid 图渲染。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
1. 改用 `Bash` 调本地 `npx -p @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli mmdc --input <file> --output <output>`，需要 Node 环境Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.No other findings across 1,857 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim langlitaosha80: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.