Skills/ClawHub/apify-local-business-audit

apify-local-business-audit@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Audit the local businesses of an area to find the ones worth prospecting — list them from Google Maps with free listing verdicts (reputation, missing website, unclaimed listing, no online booking) and optional AI qualification (digital maturity, independent vs chain, size, price tier, fit with your ideal customer), pull their Google reviews, analyze the reviews per business (sentiment, praised and criticized themes, serious complaints, complaints left without a reply, 90-day trend), add emails and social profiles from each business's website, and deliver one scored CSV row per business. Use when the user says "audit the restaurants / dentists / gyms in <city>", "which local businesses have bad reviews they never answer", "find shops without a website in <area>", "prospect list of independent businesses with no online booking", "analyze the Google reviews of these places", "reputation audit for local businesses", or wants a Google Maps → reviews → review analysis → contacts pipeline with cost control." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher maxouf · publishing for 5 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 5d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 314 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,616 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim maxouf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim maxoufPropose a patch to the maintainer