Skills/ClawHub/anti-scam-expert

anti-scam-expert@1.1.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "防骗专家。当用户提问涉及某个机会、投资、项目、合作、产品、服务等是否可信、是否为骗局时，使用此技能进行分析。触发场景包括但不限于：用户询问某事是否骗局、遇到可疑情况不知如何判断、向AI描述某个赚钱机会请分析等。此技能结合古今中外各种骗局案例与当代反诈中心典型案例，系统性识别常见骗局的模式与特征。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher gao322759 · publishing for 144 daysInstalls 724Last detonated 44 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,491 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈300 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gao322759: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim gao322759Propose a patch to the maintainer