anti-ai-foolish@0.1.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Pre-publish AI-flavor gatekeeper for Chinese long-form articles (公众号/自媒体评论). Detects and removes AI-writing tells using 1,108 rules that were A/B-validated on 52 real Tencent Zhuque detector-labeled fragments. Use whenever the user asks to 去AI味, 去AI, 降AI率, 终检/检查一篇文章 before publishing, or mentions an article was flagged or rejected by WeChat (微信打回) or Zhuque (朱雀) as AI-generated — even if they only say "这篇文章帮我看看"." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 23,905 lines in 27 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim forrestneo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.