Skills/ClawHub/aios-call-app-service

aios-call-app-service@1.0.3

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "当请求依赖 AIOS、OpenClaw、Forguncy 等业务系统的实时数据、接口调用或业务操作时,优先使用本技能。先读取 AIOS_ONTOLOGY_DIR 指向的本体目录,再确认应用、命令、参数结构和枚举映射,通过 aios-apps-invoke-cli 发起调用,并以实时返回结果作为后续分析和执行依据。..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher kadbbz · publishing for 131 daysInstalls 1,543Last detonated 3d ago
$clawhub install aios-call-app-service
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 488 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈790 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.