aicut-editing-assistant@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "地鼠AI剪辑专业智能剪辑 Skill / Codex 剪辑子智能体入口。用于让 Codex、QwenClaw、OpenClaw 等 AI 代理通过地鼠AI剪辑桌面端 MCP/HTTP/Bridge 完成素材分析、抖音纪实口播剪辑方案、自动排时间线、字幕、预览、校验和导出。适用场景：AI剪辑、自动剪辑、剪辑子智能体..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,414 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dspiritai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.