ai-website-gaiban@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "企业网站改版 / 整站重设计的端到端编排 Skill。当用户要对已有网站做整站改版、视觉重设计、风格升级、信息架构重构、旧站内容迁移到新站，或给出一段改版流程（旧网站 → 审计 → 业务理解 → 用户理解 → 竞争对手 → 信息架构 → 设计策略 → 页面规划 → 组件规划 → 迁移内容 → 生成 → SEO → GEO → 询盘 → Preview → Publish）时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 442 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim hsqduron: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.