Skills/ClawHub/ai-test-engineer

ai-test-engineer@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI测试工程师全生命周期技能集合。覆盖需求分析→测试设计→AI协作→自动化→执行监控→质量度量→专项测试7大阶段共48个专家级测试技能模块,使初级测试人员输出专家级测试用例。触发词:测试用例、测试设计、测试策略、测试分析、测试报告、接口测试、性能测试、安全测试、自动化测试、AI测试、质量度量、缺陷分析、回归测试、..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher bettermen · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 596Last detonated 31 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 2,629 lines in 12 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,105 tok
1 file · 12 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim bettermenPropose a patch to the maintainer