Skills/ClawHub/ai-policy-radar

ai-policy-radar@1.0.5

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "当用户说『最近AI出了什么新规』『EU AI Act/脆监会/NMPA有没有新动作』『法规更新我得跟上』『帮我盯AI政策』，或要持续跟踪 AI 监管动态（EU AI Act / 中国 NMPA / 美国 FDA / GDPR 等）时使用。扫描法规库/更新日志，按主题（风险分级/透明度/数据/准入）归类变动并留痕（有证），输出「本月新增了什么、对你有何影响」。可运行脚本（policy_radar 扫描器）。理论根基：LGD 三律之有证（法规变动留痕可溯）。与 eu-ai-act-companion 互补（它管单法导航，本技能管跨法动态监测）。触发词：AI法规、政策雷达、监管动态、EU AI Act更新、合规追踪、policy radar、法规监测。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · joined 2 days agoInstalls 503Last detonated 37 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 323 lines in 8 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cell