Skills/ClawHub/ai-podcast-voiceover

ai-podcast-voiceover@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI播客、播客配音、双人对谈播客技能：把文章、读书笔记、公众号文章或写好的对谈稿，整理成适合“听”的播客稿，单人主播或两位主持人各用一个音色，逐句配音并拼成整期节目 WAV，同时输出 SRT 字幕和逐句时间轴；再用 shownotes.py 根据稿件里的 `## 章节` 自动生成带时间戳的节目章节（chapters.txt / chapters.json）和完整文字稿 shownotes.md，可直接贴到小宇宙、喜马拉雅、Apple Podcasts 等平台的节目简介。改一句只重配一句。可用账号里的角色或本人授权的参考音频声音。由 Miragea 开放 API 生成语音，本地只需 Python 3.9+ 标准库、无需显卡，可 --dry-run 离线试跑；计费与限额以 capabilities 实时返回为准。适用于 Claude Code、Codex、OpenClaw、Cursor、WorkBuddy。AI podcast, podcast voiceover, two-host dialogue, show notes, chapters." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher yanghhu · publishing for 5 daysInstalls 0Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/voiceover.py:163 · Python subprocess execution detectedr = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 1,003 lines in 8 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,523 tok
1 file · 8 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yanghhu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim yanghhuPropose a patch to the maintainer