Skills/ClawHub/ai-observability

ai-observability@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI 应用可观测性与生产监控实操手册——AI 进生产后的"仪表盘与探照灯"：可观测性全景（三大支柱：日志/指标/追踪 + AI 特有观测对象）、调用追踪与日志规范（LLM 调用追踪、Span 设计、会话级追踪、敏感信息过滤）、质量监控指标（幻觉率/拒答率/满意度/转人工率实时看板）、性能与成本监控（延迟/吞吐/Token 成本实时追踪）、护栏与安全监控（护栏命中率/注入检测/敏感数据泄漏监控）、告警体系（分级告警/阈值设计/通知路由/告警疲劳治理）、监控平台与落地（埋点规范/工具选型/灰度期监控）。附零依赖本地工具一键出三大支柱清单、监控指标表、告警设计、追踪规范与落地路线。面向 AI 平台、SRE、运维与质量负责人——与 LLM 评测（离线质量）互补，本技能管线上运行质量。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · publishing for 81 daysInstalls 423Last detonated 6d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/observability_quality_test.py:23 · Python subprocess execution detectedr = subprocess.run([PY, os.path.join(TOOLS, "observability_toolkit.py")] + args,Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 1,536 lines in 19 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈995 tok
1 file · 19 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cellPropose a patch to the maintainer