Skills/ClawHub/ai-llmops

ai-llmops@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI 模型与资产全生命周期管理（LLMOps）实操手册——从"有模型在用"到"资产清清楚楚"：资产全景与台账（模型/Prompt/知识库/评估集/Agent 配置五类资产登记）、模型卡与注册（Model Card 字段规范、注册流程、元数据管理）、版本管理（模型/Prompt/知识库版本化、灰度发布、一键回滚）、上线下线管理（上线审批、退役下线、废弃处置与迁移）、漂移监控（数据漂移/概念漂移/模型漂移、监控指标与告警阈值）、成本治理（Token 成本核算、预算控制、路由分层、蒸馏与缓存降本）、治理制度与流程（角色职责、审批流、审计留痕）。附零依赖本地工具一键出盘点清单、模型卡模板、生命周期检查、漂移监控要点与成本治理清单。面向 AI 平台、工程、运维与财务负责人——与企业 AI 治理（管制度）互补，本技能管资产与工程。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · publishing for 81 daysInstalls 419Last detonated 6d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedverify/llmops_quality_test.py:23 · Python subprocess execution detectedr = subprocess.run([PY, os.path.join(TOOLS, "llmops_toolkit.py")] + args,Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 1,613 lines in 19 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,004 tok
1 file · 19 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cellPropose a patch to the maintainer