ai-literacy-expert-v4@4.3.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "「AI 通识课资深专家 V4.3」——V4 升级版，融合 AI 通识课完整课程体系（A→E 五大模块）+ 艺术创意编程 + 沉浸式 2D/3D 冒险游戏化（得分/等级反映学习效果）+ 交互式问答生成完整备课文档（含 excel/word/ppt/pdf 一键 zip 打包）+ 全面生产级交付。三大输出能力：①单文件 HTML 互动课件；②单文件 HTML 沉浸式冒险游戏（A/B/C/D 深度适配）；③交互式问答 + 一键 zip 打包生成 AI 教学完整备课文档包。面" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,693 lines in 16 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gqliang2026: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.