ai-legal-helper@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "基于 Qwen2.5-Instruct + RAG 搭建的 AI 法律咨询助手 Skill，覆盖个人创业者 / 中小微企业 / 自媒体的高频法律需求：合同智能审查、合同条款解读、法律法规检索、维权建议。提供从需求澄清 → RAG 检索 → 风险点输出 → 行动建议的完整工作流，以及 4 大核心场景的专家级 Prompt、Freemium 商业模式模板与"产品构建 → 冷启动 → 规模化"三阶段落地路线。触发场景：用户提到"AI 法律助手""合同审查""条款解读""法律咨询""个人创业法律""蓝海赛道""法律 RAG""freemium 法律服务"等。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,108 lines in 12 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lzh1998-ui: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.