ai-intel-workshop@3.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "分析 AI 对任意行业的冲击。两阶段执行：先联网检索近 12 个月信息并按四级（S/A/B/噪音）判级、输出含来源时间与核实状态的信号报告，经用户确认后产出公众号/小红书/抖音三平台内容素材（长文、脚本、发布配文、封面提示词）并落盘。触发语：AI情报车间、AI行业影响分析、分析AI对XX行业的影响/冲击/机会、AI风向标、AI冲击波。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 626 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhangxiao200141-del: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.