ai-fingerprint-desensitizer@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "平台现在不是"猜"你是不是 AI 写的，是**拿语义指纹比对**——句子节奏、关联词习惯、段落结构、标点规范度，都对得上就降权。 问题是：**你根本不知道自己的稿子哪里像 AI**，只感觉"读起来有点平"。 这套做的是**检测 → 改写 → 复检**的闭环，不是丢你一段 prompt： 1. **五维指纹检测**（可定位到句）：句式指纹 / 词汇指纹 / 结构指纹 / 节奏指纹 / 标点指纹，逐维打分并**指出最像 AI 的那几句**——先知道病在哪，才谈得上改 2. **分层改写手法**（不是换词）：具体化替换（抽象论断 → 具体事实/数字/场景）、节奏打散（破坏均匀句长）、视角注入（第一人称经验与时间地点）、信息增量（补真实案例）——**平台真正奖励的是"人工介入痕迹"，不是同义词替换** 3. **闭环复检**：改完自动复检，未达标按最弱维度再改一轮（可设最多轮次），并输出前后对比报告 4. **平台差异**：头条（语义指纹比对 + 原创度权重）、公众号（完读率第一）、小红书（AI 辅助需标注）、网文（平台审核红线）各有侧重 ⚠️ **合规边界写死在包里**：这不是"洗稿工具"，也不是"绕过审核"——是把你自己的内容补足人工痕迹（真实案例、实地数据、个人观点），这恰好是平台规则里明确要求的方向。用在别人的稿子上＝洗稿，包内直接标红。 输入：你的原稿（.md / .txt / 直接粘贴） 输出：五维指纹报告（含问题句定位）+ 改写建议 + 改写后复检对比 触发词：AI味、去AI味、降AI率、AI指纹、AI检测、内容原创度、平台降权、AI生成内容、人工痕迹、改写、去AI化、过检测。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-05 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 806 lines in 8 files.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lingyu9495-source: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.