Skills/ClawHub/ai-ethics-check

ai-ethics-check@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI 科技伦理审查合规检查 — 基于《人工智能科技伦理审查与服务办法(试行)》（工信部等十部门，工信部联科〔2026〕75号，2026-03-20 施行），覆盖 10 项核心检查，快速评估合规状态并生成专业报告。 本 skill 免费安装、免费使用。检查评分由「complianceHub 引擎」完成" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher wwumit · publishing for 93 daysInstalls 412Last detonated 10 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 735 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,233 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wwumit: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim wwumitPropose a patch to the maintainer