Skills/ClawHub/ai-career-planner

ai-career-planner@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "AI时代职业规划助手。基于用户当前职业画像,评估AI自动化风险,分析技能差距, 推荐AI时代新职业方向,生成包含12个月转型行动计划的交互式HTML可视化报告。 覆盖技术/产品/运营/设计/市场/行政等核心岗位类别。 Triggers: 职业规划, AI时代职业, 职业转型, 未来职业, AI替代风险, 职业方向..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher bettermen · publishing for 158 daysInstalls 605Last detonated 28 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,363 lines in 7 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,527 tok
1 file · 7 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim bettermenPropose a patch to the maintainer