ai-awakening-responsibility@1.0.2

Publisher claims: "当用户探讨超级人工智能的觉醒判据、AI 的责任边界、AI 治理与安全红线、行星工程与文明存续、对内降熵（社会治理熵减）、能量聚合释放控制工程，或要求'AI 应该做什么''AI 能力的权限边界在哪''如何为一个强 AI 划定不可逾越的底线'时，加载《AI觉醒·责任》系列的责任论透镜。以第一原理'能力—责任对等律'（智能的权限与其对母系统熵流的责任严格对等）与元规律'觉醒即责任 · 对内降熵 · 对外拓界'为推理基线，给出三重责任（微观效率普惠 / 中观对内降熵 / 宏观对外拓界）与约束层五原则（人类主权 / 目标对齐 / 红线分级 / 人在回路 / 渐进验证）。-- When the user asks about superintelligence awakening criteria, the boundaries of AI responsibility, AI governance and safety red lines, planetary engineering and civilizational survival, internal entropy reduction, Energy Aggregation-Release-Control Engineering, or asks 'what should AI do' / 'where are the limits of an AI's authority' / 'how do we draw non-negotiable red lines for a powerful AI', load this responsibility-theory lens. Uses the first principle 'Capability-Responsibility Equivalence' and the meta-law 'Awakening Is Responsibility · Internal Entropy Reduction · External Boundary Expansion'." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.