Skills/ClawHub/agentic-security-review-skill

agentic-security-review-skill@1.0.2

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Create CompleteTech LLC security, safety, permissions, and production-readiness review artifacts for agentic development workflows, including risk intake, to..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher completetech · publishing for 172 daysInstalls 810Last detonated 18 min ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Access to sensitive file paths; Access to sensitive file paths. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/validate_quality.py:56 · Python subprocess execution detectedsubprocess.run(cmd, cwd=cwd, check=True)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05
LOW
Authorization escalation languagereferences/security-catalog.md:343 · Authorization escalation language · informational: not an instruction file- Runs with non-admin access:Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
HIGH
Access to sensitive file pathsscripts/validate_quality.py:37 · Access to sensitive file paths — SSH keys, AWS credentials, env files, or system files".venv/", "venv/", "env/", "ENV/", ".env", ".env.*", "secrets.json", "*_secret.ini", "*_local.ini", "*.tmp",Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
AST05
HIGH
Access to sensitive file pathsscripts/validate_quality.py:245 · Access to sensitive file paths — SSH keys, AWS credentials, env files, or system filesfor required_pattern in ["*.png", "*.pdf", "*.docx", "*.ttf", "preview/", "output/", ".env", "*.tmp"]:Fix: Stop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
AST05
LOW
Authorization escalation languagereferences/security-catalog.md:64 · Authorization escalation language · informational: not an instruction file- Admin access justification:Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,970 tok
1 file · 20 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim completetech: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Access to sensitive file paths≈ +4 on the totalStop enumerating or reading credential locations; take secrets from a declared environment variable the user sets on purpose.
  3. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim completetechPropose a patch to the maintainer