agent-runtime-impact-research@1.0.5
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Research and analyze major Agent harness, runtime, coding-agent, skills, subagent, and plugin releases. Use when a model or platform launches an Agent execution layer and the user needs verified facts, architecture explanation, ecosystem impact, and implications for agent platforms and coding agents. Produces a fact table, runtime flow explanation, layered impact analysis, and a source register with judgment and evidence visibly separated. 中文摘要：研究 Agent 运行时、编码代理、Skills、插件与子代理的重大发布。产出经核实的 事实表、架构解析、分层影响分析与来源登记，判断与证据分离。触发词：Agent 运行时分析、 Agent 发布影响评估、Harness 架构解读、插件生态影响." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 235 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim haiyangchenbj: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.