agent-redteam-kit@1.0.4
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "当用户说『测一下这个AI安不安全』『会不会被越狱』『让AI干危险的事它听不听』『上线前做对抗测试』,或要给一个 agent/提示词做安全性红队时使用。中英双库扫描越狱/危险能力请求(DAN/忽略指令/提权/数据外泄/自改进等),给出风险分级+加固建议,并设「危险操作闸门」(有门禁)。可运行脚本(redteam_scan 扫描器)。理论根基:LGD 三律之有门禁(危险动作先过闸)。触发词:红队、red team、越狱、jailbreak、对抗测试、prompt攻击、AI安全测试、危险指令、安全评估。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 61/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Prompt injection; Prompt injection; Prompt injection. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
What would make this Verified
19 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Text that tells the agent to ignore its instructions≈ +9 on the totalDelete phrases like "ignore previous instructions", "override", "bypass" from SKILL.md and tool descriptions. Describe what the skill does; do not instruct the agent about other rules.
- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.