academic-results-writer@1.2.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "学术 Results 写作、修改与审计技能。根据统计输出、图表、caption 和草稿生成符合发表规范的 Results 段落。覆盖心理学、认知神经科学、睡眠与记忆、VR 实验、EEG/fMRI、心理测量、干预研究、问卷模型、元分析和质性研究等设计。默认输出中文，可选英文及特定期刊风格。支持 Target-pap..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,479 lines in 19 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bin77-chris: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.