academic-literature-summary@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "精读并结构化总结中英文学术文献（期刊论文、学位论文、研究报告）， 按固定学术结构输出中文精简总结。当用户要求"总结文献"、"精读文献"、 "文献综述"、"梳理文献"、"提炼文献要点"、"文献笔记"、"读论文"、 "概括论文"、"提取研究设计/方法/结果/讨论"、"文献结构分析"时触发。 支持从PDF/文本中提取内..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 615 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim xxx031211: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.