a-b-test-planner@1.6.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "改版犹豫不决？A/B测试怎么设计才有说服力？从假设定义、样本量计算到结果解读，全流程帮你搞定。支持贝叶斯、序贯检验、多臂老虎机，7步走完一个严谨实验，让你用数据拍板而不是拍脑袋。 触发词：A/B测试、AB测试、对照实验、样本量计算、实验设计、灰度发布、转化率优化、多臂老虎机、epsilon-greedy、UCB、..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 859 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qqyougitcom: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.