Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 79 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 5 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/README.md b/README.md
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -278,1 +278,0 @@
-<summary><strong>VS Code, Cursor</strong></summary> <br> VS Code reads `.vscode/mcp.json` in the workspace; Cursor reads `~/.cursor/mcp.json` with the same entr
diff --git a/tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py b/tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py
--- a/tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py
+++ b/tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py
@@ -245,1 +245,0 @@
-`~/.netrc` and `~/.git-credentials` are plaintext passwords in a file, and a worker
@@ -249,1 +248,0 @@
-profile's shape, and a test that needed a real `~/.netrc` to exist would be skipped
diff --git a/orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html b/orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html
--- a/orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html
+++ b/orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html
@@ -2,1 +2,0 @@
-The MCP Apps view for a review or a workflow (ext-apps 2026-01-26). The host renders it in a sandboxed iframe and posts the tool result in; nothing here fetches
diff --git a/tests/test_review_secrets.py b/tests/test_review_secrets.py
--- a/tests/test_review_secrets.py
+++ b/tests/test_review_secrets.py
@@ -114,1 +114,0 @@
-pytest.param("https://example.com:8080/path@x", id="a port is not a password"),
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.12.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: orchestrator-mcp-server: Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions (KillerSkills verdict caution 79)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 79/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orchestrator-mcp-server/0.12.0 ## Findings with a location - `README.md:278` · Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions — README.md:278 · Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions - `tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py:249` · References a credential file in the home directory — tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py:249 · References a credential file in the home directory - `tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py:245` · References a credential file in the home directory — tests/sandbox/test_escapes.py:245 · References a credential file in the home directory - `orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html:2` · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent — orchestrator_mcp/ui/view.html:2 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent · informational: not an instruction file - `tests/test_review_secrets.py:114` · URL with embedded credentials — tests/test_review_secrets.py:114 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 5 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork crAK1644/orchestrator-mcp --clone && cd orchestrator-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orchestrator-mcp-server/0.12.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/0.12.0 && git commit -am "orchestrator-mcp-server: Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orchestrator-mcp-server/0.12.0/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.