Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 73 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 3 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json --- a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json +++ b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json @@ -9529,1 +9529,0 @@ -…sed by putting the user name and password into the URL in the following format: https://username:password@your-octopi-address/", "unit": null, "type": "coString", "min": null, "m… diff --git a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py --- a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py +++ b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py @@ -79,1 +79,0 @@ -# URL (the print_host tooltip documents https://user:password@host/). The host itself, the diff --git a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py --- a/src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py +++ b/src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py @@ -249,1 +249,0 @@ -# percent-encoded: urllib would drop or misread the rest, e.g. 'http://user:123?x@host'.
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.1.25. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: orcaslicer-mcp: URL with embedded credentials (KillerSkills verdict caution 73)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 73/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orcaslicer-mcp/0.1.25 ## Findings with a location - `src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json:9529` · URL with embedded credentials — src/orcaslicer_mcp/data/print_settings_schema.json:9529 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking - `src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py:79` · URL with embedded credentials — src/orcaslicer_mcp/guard.py:79 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking - `src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py:249` · URL with embedded credentials — src/orcaslicer_mcp/printer/target.py:249 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 3 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork maxellis/orcaslicer-mcp --clone && cd orcaslicer-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orcaslicer-mcp/0.1.25/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/0.1.25 && git commit -am "orcaslicer-mcp: URL with embedded credentials" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/orcaslicer-mcp/0.1.25/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.