Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 68 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 4 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/.claude/commands/setup.md b/.claude/commands/setup.md --- a/.claude/commands/setup.md +++ b/.claude/commands/setup.md @@ -2,1 +2,0 @@ -description: "Setup omni-ai-mcp: enter your API key in chat to configure everything automatically" diff --git a/app/core/security.py b/app/core/security.py --- a/app/core/security.py +++ b/app/core/security.py @@ -620,1 +620,0 @@ -# Password in URLs (http://user:pass@host) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -54,1 +54,0 @@ -5. Update the tool count and tables (README, CLAUDE.md «Available Tools», `tests/integration/test_fastmcp_server.py`) and add a check to `scripts/smoke_live.py`. diff --git a/README.md b/README.md --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -292,1 +292,0 @@ -| `/ask-model [model] <prompt>` | Ask any model (GPT, Claude, Llama, Grok, …) |
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 4.8.2. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: omni-ai-mcp: Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials (KillerSkills verdict caution 68)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 68/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/omni-ai-mcp/4.8.2 ## Findings with a location - `.claude/commands/setup.md:2` · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — .claude/commands/setup.md:2 · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — social engineering - `app/core/security.py:620` · URL with embedded credentials — app/core/security.py:620 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking - `CONTRIBUTING.md:54` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — CONTRIBUTING.md:54 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `README.md:292` · Fake instruction boundary tag — README.md:292 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 4 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork marmyx77/omni-ai-mcp --clone && cd omni-ai-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/omni-ai-mcp/4.8.2/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/4.8.2 && git commit -am "omni-ai-mcp: Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/omni-ai-mcp/4.8.2/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.