Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py b/mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py
--- a/mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py
+++ b/mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py
@@ -181,1 +181,0 @@
-"description": "Enter your API key with the format: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
diff --git a/mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html b/mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html
--- a/mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html
+++ b/mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html
@@ -7,1 +7,0 @@
-Using Unicode symbols instead of external icon library

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.2.2. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: mcpo-simple-server: Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials (KillerSkills verdict caution 68)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 68/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/mcpo-simple-server/0.2.2

## Findings with a location
- `mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py:181` · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — mcpo_simple_server/routers/user/mcpo_user_tools.py:181 · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — social engineering
- `mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html:7` · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent — mcpo_simple_server/assets/html/index.html:7 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent · informational: not an instruction file

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 2 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._