Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js b/mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js
--- a/mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js
+++ b/mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js
@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
-"use strict";(self.webpackChunkmcp_client_jupyter_chat=self.webpackChunkmcp_client_jupyter_chat||[]).push([[526],{88:(e,t,s)=>{s.d(t,{K:()=>a});var r=s(950);class n{constructor(e){this._options=e,this

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.1.7. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: mcp-client-jupyter-chat: Base64 encoding combined with network call (KillerSkills verdict caution 56)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 56/100**. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/mcp-client-jupyter-chat/0.1.7

## Findings with a location
- `mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js:1` · Base64 encoding combined with network call — mcp_client_jupyter_chat/labextension/static/526.2a05c8e4512b459bf61c.js:1 · Base64 encoding combined with network call — potential data exfiltration

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 1 line above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._