Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 73 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 5 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/pyproject.toml b/pyproject.toml
--- a/pyproject.toml
+++ b/pyproject.toml
@@ -353,1 +353,0 @@
-# The copier-update migration reads the pre-update CLAUDE.md with a fixed-argv
diff --git a/scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py b/scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py
--- a/scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py
+++ b/scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py
@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
-"""Move a downstream from CLAUDE.md to AGENTS.md during `copier update`.
@@ -6,1 +5,0 @@
-content used to be; the project's real pre-update CLAUDE.md is still at git
@@ -142,1 +140,0 @@
-actions.append("rewrote CLAUDE.md as the @AGENTS.md stub")
@@ -145,1 +142,0 @@
-"CLAUDE.md content before this update is at `git show HEAD:CLAUDE.md`; "
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 6.1.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: markdown-vault-mcp: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files (KillerSkills verdict caution 73)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.7) and scored it **CAUTION 73/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/markdown-vault-mcp/6.1.0 ## Findings with a location - `pyproject.toml:353` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — pyproject.toml:353 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:6` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:6 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:145` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:145 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:1` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:1 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:142` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — scripts/migrate_agent_instructions.py:142 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 5 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork pvliesdonk/markdown-vault-mcp --clone && cd markdown-vault-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/markdown-vault-mcp/6.1.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/6.1.0 && git commit -am "markdown-vault-mcp: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/markdown-vault-mcp/6.1.0/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.