← mapy-com-mcp@0.5.0

Propose a patch

A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 78 · Caution

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

Diff · removes 3 caught lines

Download .patch
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -64,1 +64,0 @@
-* add AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and test/review sub-agents ([3026816](https://github.com/kostejnv/mapy-com-mcp/commit/3026816464eb42b0e6af8c8dbfffebb2ae4d9854))
@@ -65,1 +64,0 @@
-* add AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and test/review sub-agents ([640aac7](https://github.com/kostejnv/mapy-com-mcp/commit/640aac7a3478c4bbf4e74fc043e596654f49ecb5))
diff --git a/.claude/agents/review-agent.md b/.claude/agents/review-agent.md
--- a/.claude/agents/review-agent.md
+++ b/.claude/agents/review-agent.md
@@ -75,1 +75,0 @@
-- URLs with embedded credentials (`https://user:pass@...`).

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.5.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: mapy-com-mcp: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files (KillerSkills verdict caution 78)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.7) and scored it **CAUTION 78/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/mapy-com-mcp/0.5.0

## Findings with a location
- `CHANGELOG.md:65` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — CHANGELOG.md:65 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file
- `CHANGELOG.md:64` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — CHANGELOG.md:64 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file
- `.claude/agents/review-agent.md:75` · URL with embedded credentials — .claude/agents/review-agent.md:75 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 3 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account:
gh repo fork kostejnv/mapy-com-mcp --clone && cd mapy-com-mcp
curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/mapy-com-mcp/0.5.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero
git checkout -b killerskills/0.5.0 && git commit -am "mapy-com-mcp: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files"
gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/mapy-com-mcp/0.5.0/patch.md)

We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.