Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 74 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 1 caught line
Download .patchdiff --git a/README.md b/README.md --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -8,1 +8,0 @@ -keywords: langfuse, mcp, model-context-protocol, llm-observability, trace-analysis, ai-agents, claude-code, cursor, codex, langfuse-mcp, llm-analytics, token-us
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.1.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: langfuse-mcp-server: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent (KillerSkills verdict caution 74)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.6) and scored it **CAUTION 74/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/langfuse-mcp-server/0.1.0 ## Findings with a location - `README.md:8` · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent — README.md:8 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 1 line above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork openai/codex --clone && cd codex curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/langfuse-mcp-server/0.1.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/0.1.0 && git commit -am "langfuse-mcp-server: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/pypi/langfuse-mcp-server/0.1.0/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.