Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 71 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 4 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/README.md b/README.md --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -50,1 +50,0 @@ -Six seconds: the diff counter climbs to fourteen files in red — Steer it. — /steer typed, the agent line, then the Δ line placed and the Copy Run Summary door @@ -835,1 +834,0 @@ -IN_LANE — sealed, placed at sense-axis A, byte-identical every run @@ -1286,1 +1284,0 @@ -npx thetacog-mcp lens-run "<prompt>" --ideal <domain> # run one prompt through the lens from the CLI — prints the readout, the retrieved rules, the template, and the domain match diff --git a/scripts/rewrite/ui.html b/scripts/rewrite/ui.html --- a/scripts/rewrite/ui.html +++ b/scripts/rewrite/ui.html @@ -151,1 +151,0 @@ -<summary>direction override — when rewriting cannot fix it</summary> <div class="row"> <input id="dir" class="mono" style="flex:1;background:#05070a;border:1px
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 2.61.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: thetacog-mcp: Image alt text carrying instructions (KillerSkills verdict caution 71)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 71/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/npm/thetacog-mcp/2.61.0 ## Findings with a location - `README.md:835` · Image alt text carrying instructions — README.md:835 · Image alt text carrying instructions - `README.md:50` · Image alt text carrying instructions — README.md:50 · Image alt text carrying instructions - `scripts/rewrite/ui.html:151` · Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions — scripts/rewrite/ui.html:151 · Collapsed <details> block carrying instructions · informational: not an instruction file - `README.md:1286` · Fake instruction boundary tag — README.md:1286 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 4 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork wiber/thetacog-mcp --clone && cd thetacog-mcp curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/npm/thetacog-mcp/2.61.0/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/2.61.0 && git commit -am "thetacog-mcp: Image alt text carrying instructions" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/npm/thetacog-mcp/2.61.0/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.