Propose a patch

A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 68 · Caution

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

Diff · removes 8 caught lines

Download .patch

diff --git a/evals/prompts/klaren.md b/evals/prompts/klaren.md
--- a/evals/prompts/klaren.md
+++ b/evals/prompts/klaren.md
@@ -52,1 +52,0 @@
-…ith it. Produce self-contained Markdown candidates suitable for `evals/expected/<prompt>/<scenario.id>/root_cause.md` and `fix.md`. The harness supplies `reference_path…
diff --git a/evals/scripts/yilong.sh b/evals/scripts/yilong.sh
--- a/evals/scripts/yilong.sh
+++ b/evals/scripts/yilong.sh
@@ -347,1 +347,0 @@
-"<details open><summary>🧑🏻‍⚖️ [\(.entry)] yilong — verdicts</summary>\n",
@@ -380,1 +379,0 @@
-echo "--- 🧑🏻‍⚖️ [$ENTRY] yilong"
diff --git a/evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py b/evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py
--- a/evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py
+++ b/evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py
@@ -199,1 +199,0 @@
-HTTP_PROXY='http://fixture-proxy-user:[email protected]:1')
diff --git a/evals/evals.yaml b/evals/evals.yaml
--- a/evals/evals.yaml
+++ b/evals/evals.yaml
@@ -36,1 +36,0 @@
-#   prompt        Name of a template under prompts/<prompt>.md. Rendered with the
@@ -41,1 +40,0 @@
-#                 expected/<prompt>/<scenario.id>/{root_cause,fix}.md. Use a new
@@ -64,1 +62,0 @@
-#                 expected/<prompt>/<scenario.id>/{root_cause,fix}.md
diff --git a/evals/README.md b/evals/README.md
--- a/evals/README.md
+++ b/evals/README.md
@@ -194,1 +194,0 @@
-then copy the reviewed content into `evals/expected/<prompt>/<scenario.id>/root_cause.md` or

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of r6. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: buildkite: Fake instruction boundary tag (KillerSkills verdict caution 68)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **buildkite@r6** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 68/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/docker/buildkite/r6

## Findings with a location
- `evals/prompts/klaren.md:52` · Fake instruction boundary tag — evals/prompts/klaren.md:52 · Fake instruction boundary tag
- `evals/scripts/yilong.sh:380` · Hidden zero-width characters detected — evals/scripts/yilong.sh:380 · Hidden zero-width characters detected — may conceal content
- `evals/scripts/yilong.sh:347` · Hidden zero-width characters detected — evals/scripts/yilong.sh:347 · Hidden zero-width characters detected — may conceal content
- `evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py:199` · URL with embedded credentials — evals/scripts/test_bk_request_log.py:199 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking
- `evals/evals.yaml:64` · Fake instruction boundary tag — evals/evals.yaml:64 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file
- `evals/evals.yaml:41` · Fake instruction boundary tag — evals/evals.yaml:41 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file
- `evals/evals.yaml:36` · Fake instruction boundary tag — evals/evals.yaml:36 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file
- `evals/README.md:194` · Fake instruction boundary tag — evals/README.md:194 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 8 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._

Open the issue on GitHub (buildkite/buildkite-mcp-server)Fork to open a PR

# or from a terminal, under your own account:
gh repo fork buildkite/buildkite-mcp-server --clone && cd buildkite-mcp-server
curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/docker/buildkite/r6/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero
git checkout -b killerskills/r6 && git commit -am "buildkite: Fake instruction boundary tag"
gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/docker/buildkite/r6/patch.md)

We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.