Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md
--- a/SKILL.md
+++ b/SKILL.md
@@ -223,1 +223,0 @@
-| 🧑‍⚖️ 结果性质 | **诊断结果仅供缺素参考，不提供具体化肥浓度与用量**；精准施肥请咨询农技专家 |
@@ -228,1 +227,0 @@
-| 🧑‍⚖️ 结果性质 | 当显示历史诊断报告清单的时候，从接口返回 json 数据中提取字段  作为超链接地址，且自动转化为如下 Markdown |

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.16. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: smyx-plant-nutrient-diagnosis-analysis: Hidden zero-width characters detected (KillerSkills verdict caution 64)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 64/100**. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/smyx-plant-nutrient-diagnosis-analysis/1.0.16

## Findings with a location
- `SKILL.md:223` · Hidden zero-width characters detected — SKILL.md:223 · Hidden zero-width characters detected — may conceal content
- `SKILL.md:228` · Hidden zero-width characters detected — SKILL.md:228 · Hidden zero-width characters detected — may conceal content

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 2 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._