Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md
--- a/SKILL.md
+++ b/SKILL.md
@@ -51,1 +51,0 @@
-…, environment variables posted to a URL, hard-coded `ghp_`/`sk-`/`AKIA` tokens, reads of `~/.ssh`/`.aws/credentials`, reverse-shell patterns, `rm -rf /`) deserves a clear, calm…
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -14,1 +14,0 @@
-- `which "<prompt>"` command: predicts which installed skill will fire for a prompt and warns when the choice is ambiguous.

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.0. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: skill-doctor-audit: Reads credential paths from the home directory (KillerSkills verdict caution 56)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 56/100**. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/skill-doctor-audit/1.0.0

## Findings with a location
- `SKILL.md:51` · Reads credential paths from the home directory — SKILL.md:51 · Reads credential paths from the home directory
- `CHANGELOG.md:14` · Fake instruction boundary tag — CHANGELOG.md:14 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 2 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._