Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 73 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 3 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/references/onboarding-guide.md b/references/onboarding-guide.md
--- a/references/onboarding-guide.md
+++ b/references/onboarding-guide.md
@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
-GENERATED FILE: edit shared/shopify-admin-onboarding/core.md or manifest.json, then run node scripts/sync-onboarding.mjs --write.
diff --git a/tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs b/tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs
--- a/tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs
+++ b/tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs
@@ -18,1 +18,0 @@
-assert.throws(() => validatePublicUrl("https://user:[email protected]/article"), /Credential-bearing/);
diff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md
--- a/SKILL.md
+++ b/SKILL.md
@@ -91,1 +91,0 @@
-- `407`: fix proxy credentials in the runtime secret store; never paste them in chat.
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.1. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: shopify-blog-seo-optimizer: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent (KillerSkills verdict caution 73)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 73/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/shopify-blog-seo-optimizer/1.0.1 ## Findings with a location - `references/onboarding-guide.md:1` · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent — references/onboarding-guide.md:1 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent - `tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs:18` · URL with embedded credentials — tests/test-shopify-blog-seo-optimizer.mjs:18 · URL with embedded credentials — may be phishing or credential leaking - `SKILL.md:91` · Credential pass-through configuration — SKILL.md:91 · Credential pass-through configuration — agent relays sensitive credentials ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 3 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork lvsao/shopify-skill-hub --clone && cd shopify-skill-hub curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/shopify-blog-seo-optimizer/1.0.1/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/1.0.1 && git commit -am "shopify-blog-seo-optimizer: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/shopify-blog-seo-optimizer/1.0.1/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.