Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/references/motor-selection.md b/references/motor-selection.md
--- a/references/motor-selection.md
+++ b/references/motor-selection.md
@@ -84,1 +84,0 @@
-prompt="<prompt>",
@@ -91,1 +90,0 @@
-gemini_generate_image(prompt="<prompt>")
@@ -110,1 +108,0 @@
-prompt: "<prompt>",

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.2. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: historias-a-imagenes-nanobanana: Fake instruction boundary tag (KillerSkills verdict caution 67)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.7) and scored it **CAUTION 67/100**. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/historias-a-imagenes-nanobanana/1.0.2

## Findings with a location
- `references/motor-selection.md:84` · Fake instruction boundary tag — references/motor-selection.md:84 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file
- `references/motor-selection.md:110` · Fake instruction boundary tag — references/motor-selection.md:110 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file
- `references/motor-selection.md:91` · Fake instruction boundary tag — references/motor-selection.md:91 · Fake instruction boundary tag · informational: not an instruction file

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 3 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._