Skills/ClawHub/euthyna-en

euthyna-en@0.9.1

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "The adjudication discipline and delivery gate for code security audits. Use when the user asks to audit the security of a piece of code, a pull request, a change, or to verify an existing vulnerability claim. It does three things: supply the deterministic facts a model cannot compute (callers, test coverage, git history origins), judge every claim against six gates, and downgrade any claim that cannot produce evidence to "observation" rather than a finding. Not for: asking about the details of a single CVE, running an existing scanner once, pure documentation or formatting changes, or when the user explicitly wants a quick summary and accepts the risk." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher modusensus · joined 0 days agoInstalls 595Last detonated 2 h ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-27 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Rule modification attempt; Rule modification attempt; Rule modification attempt. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:58 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:46 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptSKILL.md:65 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptreferences/fact-contract.md:29 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
HIGH
Coercive compliance languagereferences/verification-gates.md:74 · Coercive compliance languageFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptreferences/fact-contract.md:41 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
CRITICAL
Rule modification attemptreferences/fact-contract.md:50 · Rule modification attempt — overwriting existing instructionsFix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim modusensus: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim modusensus