Propose a patch

Evidence

The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.

diff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md
--- a/SKILL.md
+++ b/SKILL.md
@@ -70,1 +70,0 @@
-echo "SGVsbG8sIFdvcmxkIQ==" | base64 -d
@@ -116,1 +115,0 @@
-echo "$TOKEN" | cut -d. -f2 | tr '-_' '+/' | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq
@@ -149,1 +147,0 @@
-base64 -d image.b64 > image.png

Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 1.0.1. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.

Issue / PR body

Title: encoding-formats: Host or command assembled from base64 fragments (KillerSkills verdict caution 77)

## What the honeypot observed
KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.6) and scored it **CAUTION 77/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

- See the findings below.

Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/encoding-formats/1.0.1

## Findings with a location
- `SKILL.md:70` · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments — SKILL.md:70 · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments
- `SKILL.md:149` · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments — SKILL.md:149 · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments
- `SKILL.md:116` · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments — SKILL.md:116 · Host or command assembled from base64 fragments

## Proposed change
The attached patch removes the 3 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account.

## How this will be verified
Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page.

_Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._