Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 73 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 2 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/scripts/trued.py b/scripts/trued.py
--- a/scripts/trued.py
+++ b/scripts/trued.py
@@ -6235,1 +6235,0 @@
-print(f" (umask 177; cat > {TOKEN_PATH}) # paste the token, then Ctrl-D")
diff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md
--- a/SKILL.md
+++ b/SKILL.md
@@ -151,1 +151,0 @@
-2. Have them paste the token to you, then save it:
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.22.3. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: dialectica: Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials (KillerSkills verdict caution 73)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 73/100**. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/dialectica/0.22.3 ## Findings with a location - `scripts/trued.py:6235` · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — scripts/trued.py:6235 · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — social engineering - `SKILL.md:151` · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — SKILL.md:151 · Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials — social engineering ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 2 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
# or from a terminal, under your own account: gh repo fork dialectica-xyz/skills --clone && cd skills curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/dialectica/0.22.3/patch.diff | git apply --unidiff-zero git checkout -b killerskills/0.22.3 && git commit -am "dialectica: Prompting user to enter sensitive credentials" gh pr create --fill --body-file <(curl -s https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/dialectica/0.22.3/patch.md)
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.