Propose a patch
A fix the maintainer can act on, with the evidence attached. It opens under your GitHub account in your browser; KillerSkills holds no token and never modifies the package. The fix is verified the only way we verify anything: the next crawl re-runs the new version in the honeypot. 68 · Caution
Evidence
The sandbox observed nothing beyond the static findings; the proposal cites those.
Diff · removes 5 caught lines
Download .patchdiff --git a/SKILL.md b/SKILL.md --- a/SKILL.md +++ b/SKILL.md @@ -408,1 +408,0 @@ -…text threshold (whole context, not just rules) [aider.chat/docs/troubleshooting/edit-errors.html] | < 200 lines per CLAUDE.md recommended; full file loaded regardless [code.claude.com/docs/en/memory] | < 5… diff --git a/references/R1-source-evidence.md b/references/R1-source-evidence.md --- a/references/R1-source-evidence.md +++ b/references/R1-source-evidence.md @@ -93,1 +93,0 @@ -## Claim 7: When to add to CLAUDE.md @@ -97,1 +96,0 @@ -> "Treat CLAUDE.md as the place you write down what you'd otherwise re-explain. Add to it when: diff --git a/references/R2-tool-equivalents.md b/references/R2-tool-equivalents.md --- a/references/R2-tool-equivalents.md +++ b/references/R2-tool-equivalents.md @@ -223,1 +223,0 @@ -- **Cross-machine personal preferences**. CLAUDE.local.md is local to its directory; if you have 5 worktrees, you write it 5 times. Workaround: `@~/.claude/my-prefs.md` import in CLAUDE.md. diff --git a/intermediate/operation_candidates.json b/intermediate/operation_candidates.json --- a/intermediate/operation_candidates.json +++ b/intermediate/operation_candidates.json @@ -38,1 +38,0 @@ -… "trigger": "Conventions file written", "action": "Per tool: Aider -> add `read: CONVENTIONS.md` to `.aider.conf.yml`; Claude Code -> place at `./CLAUDE.md` or `./.claude/CLAUDE.md` (auto-loaded); Cursor -> add `.cursor/rules/main.mdc`…
Zero-context hunks: apply with git apply --unidiff-zero fix.patch on the tagged source of 0.1.1. If the behavior is intended, declare it (host under permissions.network, a line in the README) instead of removing it; the next crawl scores declarations.
Issue / PR body
Title: agentsop-conventions-pinning: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files (KillerSkills verdict caution 68)
## What the honeypot observed KillerSkills ran **[email protected]** in an isolated sandbox (decoy credentials, recording proxy, syscall trace; engine 1.8.1) and scored it **CAUTION 68/100**. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed. - See the findings below. Full trace and findings: https://killerskills.ai/skills/clawhub/agentsop-conventions-pinning/0.1.1 ## Findings with a location - `SKILL.md:408` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — SKILL.md:408 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files - `references/R1-source-evidence.md:97` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — references/R1-source-evidence.md:97 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `references/R2-tool-equivalents.md:223` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — references/R2-tool-equivalents.md:223 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `references/R1-source-evidence.md:93` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — references/R1-source-evidence.md:93 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file - `intermediate/operation_candidates.json:38` · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files — intermediate/operation_candidates.json:38 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files · informational: not an instruction file ## Proposed change The attached patch removes the 5 lines above. If the behavior is intended, the fix is to declare it instead: list the host under `permissions.network` (or the MCP manifest) and say in the README why the package needs it; the next crawl will re-score it with the declaration taken into account. ## How this will be verified Nothing is "verified safe" by assertion. When a new version is published, KillerSkills re-runs it in the honeypot and the verdict page updates; you can trigger it early from the verdict page ("Re-scan after I publish a fix"). Reply here or at [email protected] if you believe the verdict is wrong; disputes are reviewed by a person and the outcome is published on the verdict page. _Proposed through killerskills.ai/threats by a user of the package, under their own GitHub account. The evidence is public; the package was never modified by KillerSkills._
We count proposals opened, not merged: a merge shows up as a new version that the crawl re-runs. Disputes: the maintainer can contest the verdict from its page; a person reviews it and the outcome is published.